AUSTRAC report on financial planners and advisers

AUSTRAC has published a report on its June 2011 survey of financial planners and advisers that provide the item 54 designated service (in section 6 of the AML/CTF Act). The survey gathered information about how these entities have understood and implemented their AML/CTF obligations.

Item 54 providers that provide no other designated services to their customers have a significantly reduced suite of obligations under the AML/CTF Act compared to most other entities. For example, they are only required to have and maintain Part B of an AML/CTF program, and are only required to submit suspicious matter reports (SMRs) to AUSTRAC.

The survey included questions relating to:

  • Customer identification (‘KYC’)
  • Money laundering and terrorism financing risk
  • Suspicious matters
  • Staff training and monitoring

The results include:

  • Very few respondents (3%) relied solely on a product provider’s customer identification procedures when identifying their customers. Most respondents applied either their own customer identification procedures only (37%), or applied their procedures and a product provider’s procedures (53%) when identifying customers.
  • Two-thirds of respondents (68%) said they never take on a new customer without meeting them face to face. A significant number (31%) said they sometimes take on new customers without meeting them face to face. AUSTRAC commented that entities are reminded that providing a service to new customers without meeting them face to face may present a heightened ML/TF risk.
  • Most respondents (96%) said they did not allow customers to deposit funds into their bank account (not including payment for professional services). Nearly all (99%) said their employees/ authorised representatives would never accept cash on their premises directly from a customer (not including payment for professional services).
  • Most respondents (90%) said that their AML/CTF program or other documentation contained an ML/TF risk assessment. However, only slightly more than half of the respondents (55%) said they had in place a method to determine the ML/TF risk rating to apply to their customers. It is AUSTRAC’s expectation that all item 54 providers should have in place a method or procedure to determine the ML/TF risk rating to apply to its customers.
 

Your Compliance Support Plan

We understand you need a cost-effective way to keep up to date with regulatory changes. Talk to us about our fixed price plans.